Français

Take Action!

Qualified Person for Environmental Assessment


The Ministry of the Environment (MOE) and the Government of Ontario have decided to proceed with the proposed amendments to Regulation 153/04 of the EPA, thereby disqualifying Chartered Chemists as Qualified Persons.

The “transition provision” period has been extended from twelve (12) to eighteen (18) months (effective April 1, 2008).

It is our understanding, from speaking with the MOE, that one of the main reasons for this decision is as stated in the Description of Regulation (EBR 010-2364): “At the core of the responsibilities of a qualified person is the application of geoscience and engineering principles.”


Recent History

In January 2008, the ACPO presented its position to the Ministry of the Environment regarding the proposed Brownfields Regulation. In light of the Ministry's negative reception, the ACPO has now issued a Press Release (Feb. 2008) and submitted an official response.

The association has also sent the following message to its members and other stakeholders.

The Ministry has met with special interest groups in recent weeks to hear representations to restrict which professionals can perform environmental site assessments to these groups while excluding all other qualified professionals. The Ministry is giving the latter a reprieve of one year to find other gainful employment AND lose forever their current qualifications. Believe it or not!

If someone was given the choice between a professional chemist who has all the specific knowledge on soil contamination with years of experience in the field and somebody who has often been taught by that professional, wouldn't that someone choose the more qualified person? Indeed, that is what logic would suggest.

Unfortunately, logic and politics do not always mix, especially in a non election year with only a few constituents being affected. The topic not being controversial so far, the decision about it need not be courageous. As they used to say in the series "Yes Minister", controversial means "you will loose votes", while courageous means "you will loose the election", so which does apply in the current situation?

For further details on this topic, click on the Environmental Registry site:
Brownfields Regulation – Qualified Persons (EBR 010-2364).

Please note that the comment period ended on February 24th, 2008.


Background Documents

Responses to the Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR) posting

Examples of Letters of Support

Contact Information